Version 2.0

Empowrd AI, AI Transparency Statement

Last Updated: 14 May 2026

This AI Transparency Statement explains how Empowrd AI uses artificial intelligence within our consultancy, diagnostics, automation, education, internal operations and client delivery work.

Our aim is to provide clear, accessible, and practical information about:

  • Where and when AI is used in our work
  • How AI supports, but does not replace, accountable human judgement
  • The types of data AI systems may process
  • The safeguards we use to support responsible AI
  • How we assess higher-risk AI use cases
  • How individuals can contact us about AI use

This statement is designed to support transparency and responsible AI use in line with applicable laws and guidance, including the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018, and UAE Federal Data Protection Law where Empowrd AI is engaged in work involving individuals or organisations in the UAE.

The EU AI Act is being implemented in phases. Prohibitions on certain AI practices and AI literacy obligations applied from 2 February 2025. The majority of obligations for high-risk AI systems, including those used in employment and HR contexts, were originally scheduled to take effect on 2 August 2026. Following a provisional political agreement on the EU Digital Omnibus on 7 May 2026, the deadline for standalone high-risk AI systems under Annex III has been moved to 2 December 2027. This agreement is provisional and awaits formal adoption. Legal counsel should confirm the final position once published in the Official Journal.

Our obligations may vary depending on the AI system, use case, risk level, the people affected, and our role in relation to that system.

This statement should be read alongside our Privacy Policy and any client-specific agreement, data processing terms, or AI governance documentation.

1. How We Use AI

Empowrd AI may use AI systems to support:

  • Business analysis, workflow mapping and operational diagnostics
  • AI readiness assessments and strategy development
  • Automation of repetitive administrative processes
  • Data analysis, insight generation and reporting
  • HR, recruitment, workforce planning and people-related advisory work
  • Content drafting, summarisation, research support and knowledge management
  • Client dashboards, process improvement and productivity tools

The nature of our AI use varies by engagement. In some projects, we act as a strategic adviser, helping clients assess and plan AI adoption without ourselves deploying a system.

In others, we may configure, integrate, or operate AI-enabled tools on a client's behalf. Our obligations under the EU AI Act and applicable data protection law differ depending on which role we are performing.

AI is used to assist analysis, recommendations, and delivery. It does not replace accountable human judgement, particularly where outputs may affect people, employment, opportunity, reputation, rights, or access to services.

2. Our Role When Using AI

Our role may vary across engagements. Depending on the project, Empowrd AI may act in one or more of the following capacities.

Strategic Adviser

Helping clients assess, plan and govern their AI adoption without directly deploying AI systems on their behalf. In this role, our direct obligations under the EU AI Act are limited, though we still apply responsible AI principles and advise clients on their own obligations.

Deployer

Using or configuring AI systems in a professional capacity under our own authority, or on behalf of a client. Where we act as a deployer, we bear obligations under Article 26 of the EU AI Act, particularly in relation to high-risk AI systems.

Data Processor

Processing personal data on behalf of a client under their instructions and in accordance with the relevant data processing agreement.

Potential Provider

Where Empowrd AI develops, significantly modifies, brands, or places an AI-enabled system into use, we assess whether provider obligations may apply under Chapter III of the EU AI Act or applicable law.

We cannot pass our compliance obligations to a technology partner. Where we deploy or configure AI systems on a client's behalf, we ensure that appropriate assessments, documentation and governance measures are in place.

3. AI Uses We Do Not Permit

Empowrd AI does not knowingly use or support AI systems for prohibited or unacceptable-risk practices under Article 5 of the EU AI Act. These prohibitions have been enforceable since 2 February 2025.

Prohibited practices we do not use or support include:

  • Subliminal manipulation that distorts a person's behaviour in ways that cause harm or that they are not aware of
  • Exploitation of the vulnerabilities of specific groups, including children and persons with disabilities
  • Social scoring of individuals by public authorities that results in detrimental or discriminatory treatment
  • Real-time remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces, except within the narrow law enforcement exceptions permitted by the Act
  • Retrospective remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces, except under judicial authorisation for specified serious crimes
  • Inferring the emotions of individuals in workplace and educational settings, except for medical or safety reasons expressly permitted by law
  • Biometric categorisation systems that infer sensitive characteristics such as race, political opinion, religion or sexual orientation
  • Untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage to build or expand facial recognition databases

We also do not support the use of AI to make final decisions about hiring, dismissal, promotion, pay, access to work, disciplinary outcomes, or other significant people decisions without appropriate human review and accountability.

4. Human Oversight

Empowrd AI does not rely solely on AI to make final decisions that may have legal, employment, financial, reputational, or similarly significant effects on individuals. Where AI supports decision-making:

  • Humans remain accountable for reviewing and interpreting AI-assisted outputs
  • AI outputs must be checked before being relied upon in high-impact contexts
  • Final decisions must be made by an appropriately authorised person
  • Human reviewers must have sufficient knowledge, context, and AI literacy to understand the system's capabilities and limitations, and to challenge, correct, override, or stop AI outputs where appropriate
  • Oversight procedures are documented where required for audit, governance, or client assurance purposes

For high-risk AI systems, human oversight requirements are governed by Article 14 of the EU AI Act, which requires that systems be designed and deployed in a way that allows the overseeing individual to fully understand the AI system, detect and address errors or bias, and intervene where necessary.

A policy position alone does not satisfy this requirement. Oversight must be operational and demonstrable.

5. AI Literacy

AI literacy is a mandatory requirement under Article 4 of the EU AI Act, which has applied since 2 February 2025. Empowrd AI is committed to ensuring that people who use, supervise or rely on AI systems have an appropriate level of AI literacy for their role.

This includes understanding the purpose of the AI system, its capabilities and limitations, possible risks, data considerations, appropriate use, human oversight requirements, and escalation routes. The level of training and guidance provided depends on the role, technical knowledge, experience, and the context in which AI is used.

As an AI consultancy, we also make AI literacy central to how we support our clients. We help organisations build the internal knowledge and capability needed to use AI responsibly, not just the tools themselves.

6. Data Our AI Systems May Process

Depending on the service or project, AI systems used by Empowrd AI may process:

  • Business documents, policies, operating procedures, and client-provided materials
  • Queries, prompts, instructions, and outputs generated during client work
  • Contact, role, and business profile information where relevant to delivery
  • HR, recruitment, workforce or organisational data provided by a client for a specific, agreed purpose
  • Usage, workflow or performance data linked to systems we help configure or review
  • Anonymised or pseudonymised datasets where appropriate
  • Licensed or approved third-party data sources

We aim to minimise personal data used in AI-supported work, in line with the data minimisation principle under UK GDPR Article 5(1)(c). We do not sell personal data to third parties.

Where AI is used in higher-risk or people-related contexts, we assess whether the data is relevant, representative, proportionate, accurate, suitable and appropriately protected for the intended purpose. For high-risk AI systems, these data quality requirements are also governed by Article 10 of the EU AI Act.

7. AI Decision-Making and Limitations

AI systems can identify patterns, generate content, summarise information and produce recommendations. However, AI outputs may be incomplete, inaccurate, biased, outdated or unsuitable for the context in which they are used. For this reason, AI outputs require human interpretation, validation and, where relevant, professional judgement.

Empowrd AI does not present AI outputs as definitive facts, legal advice, medical advice, financial advice or final decisions unless they have been appropriately reviewed by a qualified human.

Where appropriate, we test and monitor AI-supported systems for accuracy, reliability, bias, fairness, security and suitability. Reviews may take place before deployment, after material changes, periodically during use, or following an issue, complaint, or incident.

From 2 December 2027, subject to formal adoption of the EU Digital Omnibus, where AI has contributed to a decision that has legal or similarly significant effects on an individual, that individual will have the right to request an explanation of the main factors influencing the decision under Article 86 of the EU AI Act.

8. Your Rights When AI Is Used

Where AI is used in a process that affects you, a number of rights may apply. The rights available to you, and the circumstances in which they apply, depend on the jurisdiction, the type of AI system used and its effect on you.

Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018

  • The right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly significant effects, Article 22 UK GDPR
  • The right to be informed about the logic involved in automated decision-making and the likely consequences
  • The right to request human intervention in automated decisions and to contest an outcome
  • The right of access, rectification, and erasure in relation to personal data processed by AI systems

Under the EU AI Act

  • The right to receive a clear explanation of the main factors influencing a decision made by a high-risk AI system, where that decision produces legal or similarly significant effects, Article 86, applying from 2 December 2027, subject to formal adoption of the EU Digital Omnibus
  • The right to be informed that you are interacting with an AI system in certain contexts, Article 50, applying from 2 August 2026

These rights are particularly relevant where AI contributes to a decision in employment, recruitment, worker management, access to services or other high-impact contexts. To exercise any of these rights, please contact us using the details in Section 13.

9. AI-Generated Content and Synthetic Media

Empowrd AI may use AI to support drafting, editing, summarisation, research, learning materials, images, video, audio, avatars, presentations, reports, or other content.

From 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the EU AI Act introduces transparency obligations in relation to AI-generated and AI-manipulated content. Under Article 50, deployers such as Empowrd AI will be required to inform individuals when they are interacting with an AI system and to disclose when content such as deepfakes or AI-generated publications on matters of public interest has been produced or manipulated by AI.

The obligation to mark outputs in a machine-readable format so they are detectable as AI-generated sits with the providers of the underlying AI systems, not with deployers.

Ahead of and beyond that date, we apply the following principles:

  • We do not use AI-generated content to mislead people about its source, authenticity or purpose
  • Where AI has materially contributed to content shared with clients or used in public-facing contexts, we will make that clear
  • We follow the development of the EU AI Office's Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content, published in draft in December 2025, and will align our practices accordingly as it is finalised

10. High-Risk AI Systems

Under Annex III of the EU AI Act, certain AI systems are classified as high-risk based on their purpose and potential impact. This includes AI used in recruitment and candidate selection, worker management, performance assessment, access to work, training and education, and essential services.

The full suite of obligations for deployers of high-risk AI systems under Annex III was originally set to apply from 2 August 2026. Following the provisional political agreement on the EU Digital Omnibus reached on 7 May 2026, this deadline has moved to 2 December 2027. This agreement is provisional and has not yet been formally enacted into law. Legal counsel should confirm the final position once the amending regulation is published in the Official Journal, expected by August 2026.

Note: the European Commission proposed a Digital Omnibus package in November 2025 that may affect certain timelines and obligations for smaller organisations. This is a proposal and has not been enacted into law. Our approach is based on current obligations. We will update this statement if and when the position changes.

Where an AI system is or may be high-risk, Empowrd AI will assess the relevant obligations before deployment or recommendation. Depending on our role and the specific use case, this may include:

  • AI risk assessment and classification against Annex III categories
  • Data protection impact assessment where required under UK GDPR or EU GDPR
  • Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, FRIA, under Article 27, where required, particularly where Empowrd AI supports clients deploying high-risk AI in employment, recruitment or people management contexts
  • Notification to workers and their representatives prior to the deployment of a high-risk AI system in the workplace, as required under Article 26(7) of the EU AI Act
  • Data quality and bias review in accordance with Article 10
  • Human oversight controls meeting the standard required by Article 14
  • Technical and operational documentation
  • Testing, monitoring, and periodic review
  • User instructions, transparency notices, and escalation routes
  • Retention of automatically generated logs for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the system, and of at least six months, in accordance with Article 26(6), unless applicable law, including data protection law, requires a different period
  • Incident identification and response processes

As a deployer, Empowrd AI bears obligations under Article 26 of the EU AI Act when using high-risk AI systems. We work with clients to ensure that AI systems are not treated as neutral tools where they may materially affect people, rights, opportunities or access to services.

11. Records and Accountability

Empowrd AI maintains appropriate records to support responsible AI use. Depending on the project and risk level, this may include records of AI systems used, purposes of use, risk assessments, human oversight, vendor information, testing, monitoring, incidents, client instructions and review dates.

For high-risk AI systems, Article 26(6) of the EU AI Act requires deployers to retain automatically generated logs for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the system, and of at least six months. This obligation takes effect on 2 August 2026. Where applicable law, including data protection law requires a different retention period, that requirement takes precedence.

These obligations are built into our governance approach for relevant systems. These records help us evidence how AI is being used, who is accountable, what safeguards are in place, and when further review is required.

12. Useful Regulatory References

For further information, the following resources may be helpful. Regulatory requirements vary by jurisdiction, use case, and risk level. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Official Journal text of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, eur-lex.europa.eu
  • European Commission, AI Act overview, digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
  • European Commission, Navigating the AI Act, digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
  • EU AI Act Explorer, artificialintelligenceact.eu, a practical navigation and analysis tool maintained by the Future of Life Institute. This is not an official EU website.
  • ICO, Guidance on AI and Data Protection, ico.org.uk
  • ICO, Guidance on Automated Decision-Making under UK GDPR, ico.org.uk
  • Data Protection Act 2018, legislation.gov.uk

13. Contact Us

For questions about this statement, our use of AI, or how AI may have been used in relation to you, please contact:

AI Governance Contact: Empowrd AI
Email: hello@empowrd.ai

We aim to acknowledge all queries within five working days and will provide a substantive response as soon as reasonably practicable. If you are not satisfied with our response, you may have the right to raise a complaint with a relevant supervisory authority. In the United Kingdom, this is the Information Commissioner's Office, ico.org.uk. In the European Union, the relevant authority depends on your country of residence.